The buzz right now is the result of a study of two similar filter systems by group of scientists. The study showed that the Multi-Pure MPAD countertop filter is more environmentally-friendly than the Brita Aquaview faucet mount water filter.
Brita filter lovers may be disappointed at this result but this should not surprise those already familiar with the quality of Multi-Pure water filter systems.
The scientists made several complicated assumptions to conclude that the Multi-Pure MPAD will save money and save the environment better than the Brita Aquaview. Some of their assumptions include:
- numbers of people in the household that will use the filter;
- CO2 release during manufacturing and transporting each system;
- filtering technology; prices;
- characteristics of water to be filtered;
- where it is assembled (Multi-Pure in California, Brita in an Asia country);
- plus a other reasonable assumptions
In addition, the scientists provided a tool for calculating reductions in carbon footprints based on the difference between the distance from where each filter is manufactured and the point of use—your home or office. It’s no brainer; Brita cannot compete with Multi-Pure in this category. It’s assembled too far away.
The conclusion here is that the Multi-Pure MPAD is better for your wallet and the environment than Brita Aquaview. The result of the analysis actually makes sense because, according to the study, their filtering technologies are similar. Before you buy a water filter, you need to consider may factors other than the cost and brand name. Although a Multi-Pure filter system may cost more than a typical brand, the Multi-Pure filtration systems are NSF-certified and they will save you money on the long run—and save the environment.
![[Valid RSS]](http://validator.w3.org/feed/images/valid-rss.png "Validate my RSS feed")
